What Is Invitational Communication?
In initiating students into academic scholarship, we must encourage them to engage in rigorous inquiry and strong argumentation. In the Collaborative Research Model, we maintain our emphasis on inquiry and argumentation, but we do so within an ethical realm of “invitational communication” (also called “ethical communication”).
Invitational communication refers to “exchanges characterized by cooperative, responsive attempts to understand each other's points of view, ‘open-heartedness,’ and non-manipulative intent rather than efforts to win the argument or gain control over others, subjugating alternative points of view.” 1
Though you will want to emphasize the invitational communication climate at the onset of your Collaborative Research project, maintaining the climate will be an important feature of delivery throughout the entire process.
Invitational Communication As Conversation
In Turning to One Another, Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future, Margaret J. Wheatley describes an invitational communication climate when she tells us:
we acknowledge one another as equals
we try to stay curious about each other
we recognize that we need each other’s help to become better listeners
we slow down so we have time to think and reflect
we remember that conversation is the natural way humans think
we expect it to be messy at times2
For conversation to take us into a deeper realm, I believe we have to practice several new behaviors. Here are the principles I’ve learned to emphasize before we begin a formal conversation process:
As you build the climate for invitational communication in your classroom, you can work with your students to articulate what the features of such communication climate are for your particular learning environment.
1Anne Colby and Thomas Ehrlich. “Undergraduate Education and the Development of Moral and Civic Responsibility.” Position Paper: The Communitarian Network.
2Margaret J. Wheatley. Turning to One Another, Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2002. (p. xxx)
